When NGOs Go Global: Competition on International Markets for Development Donations
نویسندگان
چکیده
Why many large non-governmental organizations (NGOs) are becoming multinational entities? What are the welfare implications of this integration of markets for development donations? To answer these questions, we build a simple two-country model with horizontally di¤erentiated NGOs competing through fundraising e¤ort. We nd that NGOs become multinational if the economies of scale in fundraising are su¢ciently large. In that case, national NGOs in the smaller country disappear, while some national NGOs remain in the larger country only if the di¤erence in the countries size is large enough. Social welfare is higher in the regime with multinationals than under autarky. Keywords: non-governmental organizations, charitable giving, globalization, multinational rms. JEL Classi cation: F23, L22, L31. Copyright 2008 by Gani Aldashev and Thierry Verdier. Any opinions expressed here are those of the author and not those of the Collegio Carlo Alberto. The authors thank Jean-Marie Baland, Jean-Philippe Platteau, Jakob De Haan, Luca De Benedictis, an anonymous referee, Jonathan Eaton (the editor), and the participants of the CEPR RTN Final Conference on Trade, Industrialization and Development (Paris), the World Meetings of Public Choice Societies (Amsterdam), and the seminars at Erasmus University Rotterdam, University of Urbino, and University of Rome III for useful suggestions. University of Namur (FUNDP) and CRED. Mailing address: Department of Economics, 8 Rempart de la Vierge, 5000 Namur, Belgium. Email: [email protected]. Corresponding author: Paris-Jourdan Sciences Economiques and CEPR. Mailing address: PSE, 48 Boulevard Jourdan, 75014 Paris, France. Email: [email protected].
منابع مشابه
Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes for Universal Health Coverage: Broadening the Scope; Comment on “Priority Setting for Universal Health Coverage: We Need Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes, Not Just More Evidence on Cost-Effectiveness”
Universal health coverage (UHC) is high on the global health agenda, and priority setting is fundamental to the fair and efficient pursuit of this goal. In a recent editorial, Rob Baltussen and colleagues point to the need to go beyond evidence on cost-effectiveness and call for evidence-informed deliberative processes when setting priorities for UHC. Such processes are crucial at every step on...
متن کاملReceive aid or perish
Non-governmental organisations (NGOs) are acknowledged as being pivotal to poverty alleviation, especially in African countries where the governments’ capacity and revenue are often very limited. Despite their prominent role in developing countries, little is known about how these organisations function. Can NGOs prosper when they are financially reliant on donations and contributions from the ...
متن کاملRules and Regulations on Competition Rights in Electricity Markets: A Comparative Study
It is essential to enact restrictive laws and impose penalties for private sector participants when they play an important role in different sectors of production and trading of commodities. These laws and penalties reduce antitrust activities and protect participants against illegal activities. Therefore, the study and recognition of legal and economic issues related to the competition in diff...
متن کاملVertically Differentiating Environmental Standards: The Case of the Marine Stewardship Council
This paper explores the externally-led vertical differentiation of third-party certification standards using the case of the Marine Stewardship Council (MSC). We analyze this process in two dimensions. First, fisheries employ strategies to capture further market value from fishing practices that go beyond their initial conditions for certification and seek additional recognition for these activ...
متن کاملA Global Social Support System: What the International Community Could Learn From the United States’ National Basketball Association’s Scheme for Redistribution of New Talent
If global trade were fair, it is argued, then international aid would be unnecessary and inequalities inherent to the economic system would be justifiable. Here, we argue that while global trade is unfair, in part because richer countries set the rules, we believe that additional interventions must go beyond trade regulation and short-term aid to redress inequalities among countries that will p...
متن کامل